Agentless passives: when the event itself matters
Why omit the performer?
Often the key information is the action or its result, rather than who performed it. English offers the passive for this: place the receiver of the action in subject position without mentioning the performer.
Compare two accounts of one event: Someone broke the window and The window was broken. The first refers to an unknown performer with someone; the second focuses on the window. Both are possible. Choose the one that best conveys the intended message in context.
A window in the staff kitchen was broken over the weekend.
A window in the staff kitchen was broken over the weekend.
The damaged window is the focus. The agent is omitted; the sentence alone does not explain why.
Someone broke a window in the staff kitchen over the weekend.
Someone broke a window in the staff kitchen over the weekend.
The active sentence emphasises that a person did it, without identifying them. This can matter in a discussion of responsibility.
Three reasons to omit the agent
An agentless passive is useful when the performer is unknown (we genuinely do not know who acted), irrelevant (the result or process matters more), or obvious (general knowledge or context already identifies who or what acts).
The reasons differ, but the grammatical treatment is the same: the former object becomes the subject, and the performer is not mentioned.
Object becomes subject + be/get + past participle; omit the by-phrase when the agent is unknown, irrelevant or obvious.
- subject / S —
- The grammatical subject: who or what the clause is about; the verb agrees with it. In The book was written, the book is the subject, although someone else does the action.
- V3 / past participle —
- The third verb form: worked, gone, seen. Used after have/has or in the passive, for example; it is not always the same as V2.
- object / O —
- Who or what an action affects: in I read a book, a book is the object.
The missing hikers were finally found late last night.
The missing hikers were finally found late last night.
Which member of the rescue team found them first is unstated and unimportant for this news.
Parcels are usually delivered before noon in this area.
Parcels are usually delivered before noon in this area.
The particular courier varies and does not matter to this account.
Rice is grown in many parts of Southeast Asia.
Rice is grown in many parts of Southeast Asia.
Farmers or farms are generally understood as the growers, without explicit identification.
Form: be/get + past participle without an agent
The mechanics are the same as in a passive with an agent: be, or conversational get, in the appropriate tense plus a past participle. This introduces no new tense; omitting the by-phrase leaves the structure intact.
A common form error is omitting be or using a base verb instead of a past participle. Pay particular attention to irregular verbs: build → built, catch → caught, steal → stolen.
Subject, formerly the object + be/get in the appropriate tense or aspect + past participle.
- subject / S —
- The grammatical subject: who or what the clause is about; the verb agrees with it. In The book was written, the book is the subject, although someone else does the action.
- V3 / past participle —
- The third verb form: worked, gone, seen. Used after have/has or in the passive, for example; it is not always the same as V2.
- object / O —
- Who or what an action affects: in I read a book, a book is the object.
The results have already been announced.
The results have already been announced.
Present perfect passive: a completed event with a result relevant now.
My umbrella got left on the train this morning.
My umbrella got left on the train this morning.
A conversational get-passive, with the same basic event meaning as was left but a less formal tone.
When a by-phrase is needed
Omitting the agent is a common choice rather than a compulsory rule. If who or what acted is new, specific or important information for the listener, add a by-phrase as in any other passive.
A by-phrase is useful when the agent is new or unexpected, when the source matters, or when someone asks directly about it. A named source can be authoritative or doubtful; the point is to identify accurately whose action or report it is.
The novel was translated by the same person who translated last year's bestseller.
The novel was translated by the same person who translated last year's bestseller.
The translator’s identity is the main interesting detail; omitting it would lose the message.
The decision was reviewed by an independent panel, not by company managers.
The decision was reviewed by an independent panel, not by company managers.
The contrast between possible performers makes their identity central.
Does the by-phrase add needed information?
By someone or by the staff can sometimes be omitted when context already explains enough. But an indefinite agent is not always redundant: by somebody can stress human intervention, while by the staff can contrast staff with guests.
Check whether removing the by-phrase changes an emphasis relevant to the conversation. If it does, retain it. If it repeats the obvious, a shorter passive may be more useful.
The bill was paid by somebody before we even sat down.
The bill was paid by somebody before we even sat down.
By somebody can emphasise an unexpected act by an unknown person. If only the bill’s status matters, The bill had already been paid before we sat down is enough.
Dinner is cooked by the staff every evening.
Dinner is cooked by the staff every evening.
Omit by the staff if the cooks are already obvious. Retain it when contrasting staff with guests.
Conversational get-passives
Informal speech often uses get in place of be, especially for unexpected, unwelcome or personally significant events: got stolen, got fired, got promoted, got stuck. The basic event meaning is similar, but the tone is more conversational and less formal.
Get does not change the reason for omitting an agent: unknown, irrelevant or obvious remains the same choice in a different register. In formal news, reports or minutes, be is normally more natural.
Our flight got delayed by almost three hours.
Our flight got delayed by almost three hours.
A personally experienced inconvenience is a typical context for conversational get-passive.
The regional office was informed of the delay by email.
The regional office was informed of the delay by email.
In this formal context, neutral be is more natural than get. By email names a means of communication rather than a person performing the action.
Topic boundaries: what this lesson does not practise
The lesson focuses on one reason to choose passive voice: the status of the performer. At least two related choices can look similar but teach different decisions.
Choosing passive voice to maintain a text’s topic is covered separately. So is choosing active voice for a more direct, concise message. Here the focus is whether the performer needs to be named.
An obvious performer does not make a naturally active sentence wrong. In an ordinary first-person account such as I bought a new phone, active voice is entirely appropriate when there is no reason to avoid it.
I bought a new phone last week, and I love it.
I bought a new phone last week, and I love it.
The agent is the narrator, with no reason to hide them. Active voice is natural and outside this lesson’s target.
A quick criterion for your own speech
Before reporting an action, decide what matters now: its result, the receiver or the performer. If you choose passive voice and the performer matters, name it with by. If unknown, obvious or irrelevant, the by-phrase can be omitted.
The same criterion applies to news, everyday stories, official documents and conversational complaints, where get can help. Adapt form to context and register.
The road was closed overnight, but nobody told us who had ordered the closure.
The road was closed overnight, but nobody told us who had ordered the closure.
The performer is unnamed because the speaker lacks that information. This does not mean responsibility is unimportant.
Common mistakes
Incorrect:The parcel was steal from the doorstep.
Correct:The parcel was stolen from the doorstep.
The passive requires past participle stolen rather than base form steal.
Incorrect:The results was announced this morning.
Correct:The results were announced this morning.
Plural results requires agreement with auxiliary were rather than was.
Incorrect:The cathedral was build in the fourteenth century.
Correct:The cathedral was built in the fourteenth century.
Build is irregular; its past participle is built rather than base form build.
Incorrect:The letter was sign by the manager.
Correct:The letter was signed by the manager.
The passive after was requires past participle signed. By the manager identifies who signed the letter.
Incorrect:My phone get stolen last night.
Correct:My phone got stolen last night.
A past get-passive needs got rather than base form get.
Incorrect:It was broken the vase during the move.
Correct:The vase was broken during the move.
The passive subject is the vase; duplicating it with formal it does not form a grammatical English sentence here.
Incorrect:When the fossil was discovered?
Correct:When was the fossil discovered?
In the passive question, put auxiliary was before the subject: When was the fossil discovered?