Two moments from which to view the message
In reported speech, there is the time of the original statement and the time when it is reported. After said, told, or explained, backshift is a usual way to place the message within the past conversation: am → was, work → worked, have done → had done, will → would.
If the information remains current, a present-tense form or will can be retained. This is a choice of viewpoint, not a mechanical prohibition on a past tense. She said she worked here does not by itself mean that she has left the job.
Nadia said she works from home. We can call her there now.
Nadia said she works from home. We can call her there now.
The present tense connects the report to the current situation.
Nadia said she worked from home. I don't know whether she still does.
Nadia said she worked from home. I don't know whether she still does.
Worked reports what she said then. Uncertainty about the present is expressed separately.
Nadia said she worked from home, and she still does.
Nadia said she worked from home, and she still does.
Backshift is compatible with the state continuing.
A general fact and a change in truth are different things
General statements are often reported in the Present Simple: The tutor explained that a triangle has three sides. A past form is also possible in such a report; it does not turn a triangle into a different shape.
To emphasise that a statement remains valid now, choose a present viewpoint. If you are simply reproducing the content of a past lecture, backshift can also be natural. A particular task may request a specific viewpoint, but that is an exercise constraint rather than a universal judgement on the alternative form.
The tutor explained that a triangle has three sides.
The tutor explained that a triangle has three sides.
The general property is presented as currently valid.
The tutor explained that a triangle had three sides.
The tutor explained that a triangle had three sides.
Had can be a backshifted has in the report. It does not imply that the property has ceased to hold.
Recent statements, ongoing actions, and results
A short interval after the conversation often gives a reason to retain a present form: the state, process, or result is still relevant. However, the word just does not itself prohibit backshift.
Preserve aspect as well: is checking presents a process, while has checked presents a completed check with a current result. Do not replace a form merely to avoid backshift if doing so changes an unfinished action into a completed one.
Even something heard a moment ago may no longer match the situation. A change of state must be explained explicitly: the facts, not the number of minutes, create the difference.
Omar said he is checking the figures, so let's wait.
Omar said he is checking the figures, so let's wait.
The current check is not yet complete.
Omar said he has checked the figures, so the report is ready.
Omar said he has checked the figures, so the report is ready.
The completed result matters now. Has checked does not mean is checking.
A moment ago she said she was cold, but she feels warm now.
A moment ago she said she was cold, but she feels warm now.
The conversation's recency does not cancel a known change of state.
Tomorrow and here depend on the reporting day and location
An unshifted verb does not require every other word to remain unchanged. Pronouns, today, tomorrow, here, and this must identify the correct people, day, and place from the reporter's viewpoint.
If the day or location is the same, tomorrow or here may remain even beside a backshifted verb. If the day or location has changed, a specific date or place name is often clearer than mechanically using that day or there.
On Monday morning Jo said, 'I'll call tomorrow.' On Monday afternoon I reported: Jo said she would call tomorrow.
On Monday morning Jo said, 'I'll call tomorrow.' On Monday afternoon I reported: Jo said she would call tomorrow.
Would adopts the viewpoint of the conversation; tomorrow still means Tuesday.
On Tuesday morning I said: Jo said she will call today.
On Tuesday morning I said: Jo said she will call today.
The same expected call now falls on today. Will is appropriate if the call is still in the future.
The guide said the entrance is on King Street.
The guide said the entrance is on King Street.
The specific name preserves the location without requiring the listener to guess what here refers to.
The future relative to then and the future relative to now
When reporting will, would expresses the future from the viewpoint of a past conversation. The event may still lie ahead now, may already have happened, or may not have happened. The form alone does not report the outcome.
Will can be retained when a prediction, promise, or planned event remains current and future at the time of reporting. If you report an old plan after its scheduled date, do not present it as a new future event from your own viewpoint.
Last week they said the bridge would reopen on Friday. It reopened as planned.
Last week they said the bridge would reopen on Friday. It reopened as planned.
Would does not mean that the plan failed.
They said the bridge will reopen tomorrow; the closure notice is still in place.
They said the bridge will reopen tomorrow; the closure notice is still in place.
The reopening is still in the future now. Backshifted would is also possible when reporting the same plan.
Past events and forms that need no further backshift
The Past Simple can often be retained if the time relationships are already clear: She said the power failed during the storm. The Past Perfect can additionally show that the event preceded the conversation: She said the power had failed during the storm.
The Past Perfect does not acquire another had. Likewise, could, would, should, and might remain unchanged in many ordinary reports. Do not mechanically add have + V3 (the past participle, such as finished or gone): this may create a different meaning, such as an assessment of an unfulfilled obligation.
In a longer report, choose forms for each time relationship. A general property can remain in the present alongside a completed past episode.
Eva said the lights went out while she was cooking.
Eva said the lights went out while she was cooking.
The unshifted past forms naturally preserve the interruption of an ongoing process by an event.
Eva said the lights had gone out while she was cooking.
Eva said the lights had gone out while she was cooking.
The Past Perfect emphasises that the event was earlier; while she was cooking preserves the process at the relevant moment.
Our accountant said we should save every receipt.
Our accountant said we should save every receipt.
Should preserves the advice. Should have saved would create a different temporal viewpoint.
Tense is not a test of truth
A report tells us what someone said. Even a present-tense form does not independently prove that the content is true or that you have personally checked it. You can report a current claim and mark uncertainty separately.
Past forms are not automatic signals of distrust either. To distinguish a report from your own knowledge, say so explicitly: I haven't checked, I don't know whether that's still the case, or but the latest figures show something else.
A practical sequence is to establish when the original words were spoken, identify what is known now, preserve the participants and time relationships, and add clarification if needed. Do not make one tense carry every message at once.
The agent said the flat is available, but I haven't checked that myself.
The agent said the flat is available, but I haven't checked that myself.
The present tense conveys a current claim, not a guarantee of its truth.
He said the office was empty. In fact, two people were still inside.
He said the office was empty. In fact, two people were still inside.
The following sentence establishes the discrepancy, not the form was itself.
Common mistakes
Incorrect:She said she is work on the draft.
Correct:She said she is working on the draft.
An ongoing process requires an -ing form after is. The combination said + is is itself correct.
Incorrect:He told me he has finish the checks.
Correct:He told me he has finished the checks.
In the Present Perfect, has requires a past participle. The presence of told does not make has incorrect.
Incorrect:They said they would arrives on Tuesday.
Correct:They said they would arrive on Tuesday.
After would, use the base form without -s.
Incorrect:She said that she had had finished before noon.
Correct:She said that she had finished before noon.
Finished forms the Past Perfect with one had. Further backshift does not add another auxiliary. Had had is possible with the main verb have, but not here.
Incorrect:He asked where was the entrance.
Correct:He asked where the entrance was.
An indirect question has subject → verb order. Choosing is or was does not restore direct-question inversion.