VocairoStart learning

Reported Speech: Statements

Report what someone said from the correct time perspective: apply backshift, preserve current facts, and do not change anything that is already in the Past Perfect.

Published

Shifting Tenses in Reported Speech

Reporting the Meaning, Not Rearranging Every Word

In a reported statement, name the speaker and convey the meaning of their statement. After said, you can use that or leave it out. Quotation marks around the report are not needed. A report tells us what was said; this does not by itself confirm that the statement is true.

Backshift is a change in tense when we view a statement from a past point in time. It does not move the event itself to another day.

How to build it

speaker + said (that) + subject + verb

subject / S
—
The grammatical subject: who or what the clause is about; the verb agrees with it. In The book was written, the book is the subject, although someone else does the action.
verb / V
—
A word for an action or state, such as work or be. The pattern determines its form.

Rita said that she was busy.

Rita said that she was busy.

Her original I'm busy described her state during the conversation; was conveys that state from a past point in time.

I said I needed a break.

I said I needed a break.

I am reporting my own words, so I remains I; need changes to needed.

Present Forms from a Past Perspective

When we apply backshift: Present Simple changes to Past Simple, Present Continuous to Past Continuous, and Present Perfect to Past Perfect. Preserve the difference between a habit, an ongoing process, and an action that has already been completed.

How to build it

work → worked; am/is/are working → was/were working; have/has worked → had worked

Oleh said he checked the stock every morning.

Oleh said that he checked the stock every morning.

The original I check described a habit, so the simple form checked is needed.

Nadia said she was checking the stock.

Nadia said that she was checking the stock.

Her I am checking described a process that was happening at that time.

Sam said he had checked the stock.

Sam said that he had checked the stock.

His I have checked reported a stock check completed before the conversation.

An Action Before an Earlier Conversation

We often report Past Simple as had + V3, and Past Continuous as had been + -ing. This shows that the event happened before the speaker's words.

In natural reporting, Past Simple or Past Continuous is sometimes retained when the time relationships are clear. In exercises requiring complete backshift, we practise Past Perfect specifically; another grammatical option may not meet the exercise's goal.

Mila said she had lost the key on Monday.

Mila said that she had lost the key on Monday.

The original I lost the key on Monday is reported with clear backshift: lost → had lost.

Dan said he had been cooking at six.

Dan said that he had been cooking at six.

The original I was cooking at six became had been cooking; six o'clock did not change.

Do Not Add Endless had Forms

Do not backshift the Past Perfect again: had finished remains had finished. Present Perfect Continuous becomes had been working with backshift. Do not add a second had to an auxiliary verb that is already complete.

Eva said she had already eaten before the call.

Eva said that she had already eaten before the call.

Her I had already eaten before the call already contained the Past Perfect, so the form stayed the same.

Leo said he had been waiting for an hour.

Leo said that he had been waiting for an hour.

The original I have been waiting for an hour relates the duration to the conversation; after backshift, we have had been waiting.

Modal Verbs: Form and Meaning

With backshift, will usually becomes would, can becomes could, and may in the sense of possibility becomes might. The base form of the verb remains after them.

Could, would, should, and might are usually kept. Do not turn every piece of advice or possibility into a completed action by adding an unnecessary have + V3.

How to build it

will send → would send; cannot open → could not open; may rain → might rain

The courier said he would call.

The courier said he would call.

Would expresses an action that was future relative to his words; it does not yet prove that the call happened.

Zoe said she could not open the file.

Zoe said she could not open the file.

The original I can't open the file retains the negative meaning.

Ben said we should take a map.

Ben said we should take a map.

The original We should take a map remains advice with should.

When You Can Keep the Current Form

Backshift is not always required after said. If a fact is still true, the result is still relevant, or a promised event is still in the future, you can keep the present form or will.

A backshifted tense by itself does not prove that a fact is no longer true. With says, there is no automatic requirement to change to the past tense when reporting a current state.

Tara said she works at the library. She still works there.

Tara said she works at the library. She still works there.

Works directly connects the report with a current fact; worked can also be appropriate in the report.

The driver said he will arrive at seven. It is only six.

The driver said he will arrive at seven. It is only six.

The future event has not happened yet; will is acceptable, as is the backshifted version would.

Marta says she needs the address.

Marta says she needs the address.

Says reports a current statement, and needs preserves the current need.

Who Is Speaking, When, and Where

Change I, we, you, and the words today, here, and tomorrow according to the actual reporting situation. If you are reporting your own words, I can remain I. If it is the same day, you can keep today: changing it to that day is not automatic and depends on the narrative perspective you choose.

First identify the speaker, the listener, and the time of the event. Then choose the tense. This helps preserve the meaning even in a short statement.

On Wednesday, I explained that Nina had said she would arrive on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, I explained that Nina had said she would arrive on Tuesday.

On Monday, Nina said I will arrive tomorrow. The stated date Tuesday removes dependence on the day of reporting.

We said we were ready.

We said we were ready.

We are reporting our own We are ready; are changes, but the participants do not.

Common mistakes

Incorrect:She said she had wrote the note.

Correct:She said she had written the note.

After had, use the third form written, not the Past Simple wrote.

Incorrect:He said he would arrived at eight.

Correct:He said he would arrive at eight.

After would, use the base form arrive; the past perspective has already been expressed by the modal verb.

Incorrect:They said they was waiting.

Correct:They said they were waiting.

With they, use were; backshift does not cancel subject–verb agreement.

Incorrect:I said I didn't knew the answer.

Correct:I said I didn't know the answer.

After didn't, use the base form know.

Incorrect:He said he had had finished.

Correct:He said he had finished.

In had finished, the auxiliary had is already present. A second had is unnecessary here; this is not the construction had had + noun, for example had had lunch.

Sources

Changing time and place references in reported speech

Why time and place words change

Words such as tomorrow, here, this, now, and ago depend on a reference point: tomorrow means the day after the speaker's current day, and here means the speaker's location. If you report someone's words later or elsewhere, that reference point has changed. You therefore need an expression that still identifies the same place or time in relation to the original words.

Before reporting, ask three questions: when was it said, where was it said, and where and when am I reporting it? A time or place word may need replacing only if the relevant reference point has changed.

Rob said he would see me the next day.

Rob said he would see me the next day.

This reports “I'll see you tomorrow”, said on a day that is now long past.

Tina said she had left her bag there the day before.

Tina said she had left her bag there the day before.

There and the day before identify the place and day in relation to her original words.

Day expressions: yesterday, today, tomorrow, tonight

Typical changes are yesterday → the day before or the previous day; today → that day; tomorrow → the next day or the following day; tonight → that night or that evening; this morning → that morning. All refer back to the day of the original statement.

On can be added: on the next day, on the previous day. However, the expressions the next day and the day before are used without at.

How to build it

yesterday → the day before; today → that day; tomorrow → the next day

Hana said she had called the vet the previous day.

Hana said she had called the vet the previous day.

Yesterday has been replaced with an expression referring back to the day of her statement.

Ivo said he was going to the station that evening.

Ivo said he was going to the station that evening.

Tonight has become that evening.

Weeks, months, years, and now / ago

Report periods as follows: last week → the week before or the previous week; this week → that week; next week → the following week or the next week. The same applies to month and year. In a later report, now becomes then or at that time. Ago counts backwards from the moment of speaking, so it is replaced by before or earlier in a shifted report.

These changes apply when enough time has passed for the reference to shift. If you report immediately, for example within the same week, last week or this week may remain unchanged.

How to build it

last week → the week before; next month → the following month; ago → before

Mia said she had been abroad the month before and would return the following spring.

Mia said she had been abroad the month before and would return the following spring.

The month before and the following spring count time from Mia's past statement, not from the moment of this report.

Eli said he had finished school three years before.

Eli said he had finished school three years before.

Ago has become before: the three years are counted back from the time of his words.

Place and demonstratives: here, this, these

Here becomes there when you are no longer in the original speaker's location. This becomes that, and these becomes those, if the object or place is no longer near you. In a neutral report, the is often enough: the coat, the boots.

If the report is made in the same place, here can be retained. There is also sometimes possible when the narrator refers back to a previously mentioned location or chooses a more distant viewpoint. What matters is that the listener identifies the actual location correctly; a simple table does not determine the only possible version.

How to build it

here → there; this → that; these → those

Olek said he would leave the parcel there.

Olek said he would leave the parcel there.

The speaker referred to the place where he was; from your present viewpoint, it is there.

Nadia said she preferred that sofa.

Nadia said she preferred that sofa.

Her this sofa has become that sofa because the sofa is no longer near you.

When no change is needed

Replacement depends on the reference point. In the same place and on the same day, today, here, and tomorrow may remain unchanged. Retain now if the relevant state still applies: an interval of five minutes does not itself guarantee this. That day, then, or there can also describe the same episode from another narrative viewpoint.

Mixed situations are possible: the day has changed but the place has not. Then change only the time expressions and retain here. Sometimes the reference even coincides with the present: what someone called tomorrow yesterday is today for you, making today appropriate.

Pete said he was waiting here now.

Pete said he was waiting here now.

The report is immediate and in the same place, so here and now are retained.

Lina said she would be here the next morning.

Lina said she would be here the next morning.

The time reference has shifted, but the place is the same: the next morning, but here.

The forms of the expressions: articles, prepositions, and word order

Tomorrow, yesterday, and tonight do not take the; they are replaced by complete expressions such as the next day, the day before, and that night. In the day before, before follows day. Do not use at with the next day, that day, or the following week; on the next day is possible.

Where two usual alternatives exist, both are correct: the next day and the following day, two years before and two years earlier. Choosing between them is a matter of style, not correctness.

Kai said he would phone the following week.

Kai said he would phone the following week.

Do not put at before the following week.

Sue said she had arrived that morning.

Sue said she had arrived that morning.

That morning is used without a preposition.

The scope of the topic and application in speech

Verb forms also shift in reports (will → would, is → was). That is a separate topic. Here the verbs fit the report, but the focus is on time and place expressions. Choosing said or told is a separate topic too.

To apply this rule in speech, briefly check three things before each report: where and when the original words were spoken, where and when you are reporting them, and whether these reference points coincide. Then replace only the words whose reference really has shifted.

Dora said she would join us there that weekend.

Dora said she would join us there that weekend.

Two expressions refer back to her situation: there and that weekend.

Common mistakes

Incorrect:Vera said she would visit us the tomorrow.

Correct:Vera said she would visit us the next day.

Tomorrow does not take the. To name the day after her statement, use the next day.

Incorrect:Pete said he had arrived at the day before.

Correct:Pete said he had arrived the day before.

The day before is used without the preposition at.

Incorrect:Nora said she would call me following week.

Correct:Nora said she would call me the following week.

Following week requires the article the in this expression.

Incorrect:Ken said he had met her the before day.

Correct:Ken said he had met her the day before.

Before follows day: the day before.

Incorrect:Tom said he would come at that day.

Correct:Tom said he would come that day.

That day is used without the preposition at.

Sources

Say versus tell when reporting statements

Two patterns: said and told

When reporting someone’s words, we often choose between say and tell. Their meanings are very similar, but their structures differ: the key is whether the sentence names the person addressed.

Said uses “speaker + (that) + message”, without a recipient in this basic pattern. Told uses “speaker + recipient + (that) + message”: the person is required directly after the verb. That can be omitted in both reporting patterns.

How to build it

subject + said (that) + clause | subject + told + person + (that) + clause

subject / S
—
The grammatical subject: who or what the clause is about; the verb agrees with it. In The book was written, the book is the subject, although someone else does the action.
clause
—
A construction with a verb, often with its own subject: when I arrived. A non-finite clause may leave the subject unspoken: to get home.

Peter said that the café was full.

Peter said that the café was full.

No recipient is named: said + that-clause.

Peter told Clara that the café was full.

Peter told Clara that the café was full.

Clara is named directly after told, without to.

Greta told us she would be home by six.

Greta told us she would be home by six.

That is omitted, but the recipient us remains necessary.

Say: no recipient, or a recipient with to

A person does not directly follow say: said me and said him are incorrect. If the recipient needs naming, introduce them with to: said to me, said to the manager.

In everyday reporting, told + person is often preferred when the recipient matters. Said to + person is completely correct, though often less natural for an ordinary report of a message.

The announcer said that the gate had changed.

The announcer said that the gate had changed.

No recipient is named: said that.

Marek said to his boss that the report was ready.

Marek said to his boss that the report was ready.

The recipient follows to: said to + person.

What did Hanna say to you?

What did Hanna say to you?

The recipient also follows to in a question.

Tell: the recipient directly follows the verb

In the active reporting pattern told + person + (that) + message, the recipient is necessary: told me that … . Do not put to between told and this recipient. Other patterns have their own structure: tell the truth, I was told that … .

The recipient can be a noun phrase, such as the tenants or my sister, or an object-form pronoun: me, you, him, her, us, them. Do not use I, he, she or we here: told I is not possible.

Our landlord told the tenants that the heating was broken.

Our landlord told the tenants that the heating was broken.

The recipient the tenants directly follows told.

Please tell your sister that dinner is ready.

Please tell your sister that dinner is ready.

Tell + your sister + that-clause.

Joanna told them she had passed.

Joanna told them she had passed.

Object-form them, without to.

Choosing by meaning: are you naming the recipient?

The same event can be reported with either verb. Said works when the recipient is unimportant, unknown or obvious. Told works when it matters who was told: you, the team or a neighbour.

Both verbs form negatives and questions in the usual way: didn’t tell me, didn’t say that, Did she tell you ...? Remember the base form after didn’t and Did.

The coach said that training was cancelled.

The coach said that training was cancelled.

The content matters; no recipient is named.

The coach told the players that training was cancelled.

The coach told the players that training was cancelled.

The same fact, with the recipients named.

He didn't tell anyone that he was ill.

He didn't tell anyone that he was ill.

The negative with tell retains the recipient anyone.

Tell in fixed expressions: a person is not always required

Some combinations put a noun rather than a person after tell: tell the truth, tell lies, tell a story, tell a joke, tell a secret. They already have an object, so a separate person is optional: She always tells the truth. Say does not naturally combine with these nouns in this use: say a joke and say the truth are not the usual expressions.

If you name a recipient, it can directly follow tell: told the children a story. The order with to after the noun is also possible: told a story to the children. Say naturally combines with greetings and similar expressions: say hello, say goodbye, say sorry.

Remi told the truth about the broken window.

Remi told the truth about the broken window.

Tell the truth does not require a person.

The comedian told three jokes before the break.

The comedian told three jokes before the break.

Joke combines with tell.

Our grandmother told the children a story about a fox.

Our grandmother told the children a story about a fox.

The recipient directly follows told, followed by the noun object.

She said goodbye and left.

She said goodbye and left.

Say combines with greetings and farewells.

The topic’s limits and neighbouring rules

Here we practise choosing say or tell and building their statement-reporting patterns. Clause backshift, such as is → was, and changes to words such as yesterday or here belong to separate topics. The reported clauses are supplied so that attention stays on the reporting verb.

Commands and requests, such as told me to wait, indirect questions and passive I was told that … are studied separately. In told me to wait, the recipient follows told; in the passive, the recipient is already subject I, so no separate me follows told.

She told me to wait outside.

She told me to wait outside.

The same told + person pattern, followed by a to-infinitive: the separate topic of reporting commands.

The nurse said that the clinic was open.

The nurse said that the clinic was open.

The clause is supplied; only the choice of reporting verb is practised here.

Using the patterns in speech

Before speaking or writing a report, ask two quick questions. Does it matter who was told? If yes, use told + person or said to + person. If not, choose said without a person.

Check the active patterns studied here: said (that) + message; told + recipient + (that) + message; said to + recipient. This is not a universal test for every that: in other constructions, that can itself be part of a noun phrase.

My neighbour said that the lift would be fixed soon.

My neighbour said that the lift would be fixed soon.

No recipient is named: said that.

My neighbour told me that the lift would be fixed soon.

My neighbour told me that the lift would be fixed soon.

The speaker is named as recipient: told me.

Common mistakes

Incorrect:My cousin told that she was getting a new job.

Correct:My cousin said that she was getting a new job.

Told requires a recipient in this active reporting pattern. Without a person, use said.

Incorrect:The nurse said me that the doctor was late.

Correct:The nurse told me that the doctor was late.

Said does not take a person directly; me in this structure requires tell.

Incorrect:He told to me that he was busy.

Correct:He told me that he was busy.

The person follows told without to.

Incorrect:He said a lie to his teacher.

Correct:He told a lie to his teacher.

Lie combines with tell rather than say.

Incorrect:Our guide said us about the old town.

Correct:Our guide told us about the old town.

A person does not directly follow said; reporting information about a topic here requires told us about.

Incorrect:She didn't told me the news.

Correct:She didn't tell me the news.

After didn’t, use base-form tell.

Sources
Practise with Vocairo